Lindau Young Scientist Collaboration: A Vision for Life Sciences Publishing
Inspired by discussions at #LINO18, our Alumni Constanze Depp and Philip Lewis have thought of a future concept for publishing in life science.
BLOG - Science Publishing
Wie sieht die Zukunft des wissenschaftlichen Publizierens aus?
Wissenschaftliche Arbeiten zu publizieren ist ein riesiger Anteil im Leben und der Karriere von Wissenschaftlern. Im letzten Jahrzehnt wurde jedoch mehr und mehr Wert auf einzelne große Journale und Impact-Faktoren gelegt. Dies muss geändert werden, aber wie?
What Will the Future of Scientific Publishing Look Like?
Publishing papers is a huge part of a researcher’s life and career. But over the last decades more and more emphasis has been put on a handful of big journals and the impact factor has become the currency of academia. This needs to change, but how?
From Impact Factor to the Nobel Prize
The scientific community – junior and established scientists alike – must think deeply about how science should be evaluated
Reproducing Research Findings Comes at a Cost
Publish or perish – shall we factor in reproducibility?Publish or perish – shall we factor in reproducibility?
In Transition: Scientific Publishing in the Life Sciences
Scientific publishing is about to undergo drastic changes for the better. Preprints are on the rise, and they are gaining momentum. Nobel Laureates Randy Schekman and Martin Chalfie comment on publishing practices in the life sciences.
Rethinking Authorship
Author positions serve as the key currency in academic careers. This needs to change, argues postdoctoral fellow Daniel Hornburg.